Go We Therefore

I often hear well-intentioned people equate The Great Commission with the Church’s role in God’s global mission. That is to say, they see “go and make disciples of all nations” as defining the mission of the church today. This view of mission, however, is incomplete. Jesus’ instructions to the 150 or so disciples who were present to watch Him ascend into heaven certainly apply to the church today, but it isn’t the entirety of our mission on this earth.

Let me explain:

Throughout the scriptures, God interacts with humans by sending them to accomplish His purposes. He rarely just pops into human history simply to say hello. He sends His people.

  • “Go to the land I will show you” (Genesis 12:1)
  • “Go and speak to the house of Israel” (Ezekiel 3:1)
  • “Who shall I send? And who will go for us?” (Isaiah 6:9).
  • “Go to the great city of Nineveh and proclaim to it the message I give you” (Jonah 1:2; 3:1)
  • “Go! I am sending you out like lambs among wolves” (Luke 10:3)

The problem is that God send so often, we have to determine when He was sending all Christians for all times in all places, and when He was simply talking to an individual person. At times, God sent individuals (and sometimes groups) to do specific things in His name. In Luke 10, He sent 72 of His followers ahead of Him. In Luke 19, He commanded a couple disciples to borrow a colt for His triumphal entry into Jerusalem. While we recognize the broader application and meaning of these “commissions,” we don’t necessarily interpret these commands as being universal. The question is this: was Jesus speaking to the universal church when He commanded His disciples to “go and make disciples of all nations?” The answer, of course, is yes. And no.

As Christopher Write points out in “The Mission of God’s People,” there’s little evidence that the Great Commission served as the primary motivator of the early church’s missionary expansion. In fact Jesus’ words in Matthew 28 aren’t referred to again in the New Testament.

So there must have been something else that compelled (and propelled) God’s people to deliberately cross cultures with the gospel. They certainly went out boldly proclaiming Christ– most of the apostles were killed for talking about Jesus.

Wright asserts that the “something else” was the early church’s understanding of who they were as God’s people. The disciples knew God’s story, and the Great Commission was their place in it. We find ourselves in that same story. Our sentness doesn’t just lie in Christ’s commands to go, but in our identity as His body and bride. He sent his disciples, (and sends us) just as the Father had sent Him.

In Christ, we are God’s called-out people who are then sent back into the world. Sent to do what? Yes, to make disciples. But also to be salt and light. To love our neighbors. To make peace. To care for widows and orphans. To build up the church. To do justice, love mercy, and walk humbly with our God.

We are a people on mission, but we have not only been sent once.

About E. Goodman

Ernest Goodman is a missiologist, writer, teacher, and communications strategist.


  1. Ernest, I’m not sure I would understand what you were talking about unless I was also listening to Christopher Wright’s work you speak about. But it would raise my curiosity, for sure. In fact, I think I chanced upon Wright’s work because of previous things you’ve written that have piqued my curiosity. So thanks.

    I might drive you nuts because I’m sooo into “covenantal epistemology” right now. According to that perspective, it would say the command we typically say is the “Great Commission” is “focal” while the relationship with Christ as His church, his bride, is “subsidiary.” So are the other commands of God. Former epistemology – modernity and even postmodernity – clings and makes a god out of commandments, the one glorifying it, the other rejecting it.

    So basically, you can’t really have something in focus unless you “indwell” the surrounding stuff.

    Oh man, I think I just did a terrible job of trying to explain that. Anyway, if you’re interested, take a look at this new little book called “A Little Manual for Knowing” by Esther Meek. It’s a nice complement to missiology.

  2. Johanna,
    The more people who read Wright, the better! Someday, I want to meet him.

    I think you’re right- a big part of conflating “the Great Commission” with “the Mission of the Church” is due to a modernistic understanding of Christ’s “commands.” It’s very similar to the way many people refer to “fulfilling,” “finishing,” or “completing” the Great Commission– I find this to be a modernistic interpretation of the text. It also seems much more interesting (to me, anyway) to consider what Jesus’ commands say about Him.

    Oh, and thanks for the book recommendation. I’ll look into it.

  3. Yeah, it would be amazing to meet him, right? Since I’m listening to his book – instead of reading it – I get to hear his great Irish accent.

  4. Hold up. I can LISTEN to this book? Well I need to get on it! Ernest has spoken so much about Christopher Wright that I’ve had his book on my list to buy. Now I’ll find the audio book!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>