Contextualization is the active work of translating the gospel into a culture that doesn’t have an indigenous expression of Christianity. The problem is that we all seem to be “contextualizing” for a culture that we don’t live in. We all look alike because we were all mentored by the same six guys (John, Rick, Mark, Brian, Tim, and Andy). We look like them because we know we don’t want to look like where we came from. We assume that if it seems new and cool and more biblically sound than whatever it is we’re reacting to, that it’s suitable for the context in which we minister.

Slapping a new coat of paint on the same old conventions is not contextualization. We need to be sure we’re contextualizing for the context to which we’re called- the ones in which we find ourselves. It won’t do to make your church look like someone else’s. You can’t just steal somebody else’s sermon. You can’t pipe in a great speaker who doesn’t know your context. You must be an expert in the people to whom you minister.

If you don’t do the missionary work of contextualization, you still can grow your church. But it won’t belong to the culture in which it’s planted. In order to be discipled in the foreign system you set up, people will have to first be converted to your culture- the one you imported from Grapevine, Texas, or Minneapolis, Minnesota, or Seattle, Washington. Then, you’ll find yourself having to train people to interact with the culture from which you’ve extracted them.

Which is the point, really- contextualization should be worked into the essence of every expression of Christianity. It is the key to indigenous church, and it is the key to communicating the gospel in a way that connects with your audience.

So you should wear cool glasses. If you have hair, you should either spike it up or grow it out. If you can handle a neckbeard, that’d be good. Do your best to squeeze into skinny jeans. Find a keffiyeh, and wear it even when it’s 90 degrees out. Watch Lost and 30 Rock. Talk about when Grey’s Anatomy jumped the shark. Become a vegan, or at least a part-time vegetarian. Listen to hip-hop, indie bands, alt-country, and  Drink fair trade coffee-with organic soy milk, of course. You also need to ride a fixed-gear bike, smoke a cigars, drink microbrewed beer, and play hours of video games. Get a Mac, and talk about how long it’s been since you even tried using a PC. Oh, and an iPhone. You definitely need an iPhone.

Why? Contextualization, of course. But to which context?

My point is this: contextualization isn’t looking like the culture; it’s having lived in the culture. It’s how you think and communicate after putting yourself in someone else’s shoes for a while. Knowing the way it feels. Understanding how people treat you when you’re one of them. The experience is what makes you able to translate the gospel into a (sub)culture in a way that makes sense to the people who live there.

If you’re ministering to the homeless, you might try spending a night (or a month) on the street. If you’re in a community of Arabs, you should consider praying 5 times a day, seasoning your conversation with, “God willing,” and skipping the pulled-pork sandwich. Not to fool them into thinking you’re the same as them. You’re not. But until you’ve put yourself in their shoes, you really don’t have any idea what life it like for them- what’s important to them, what speaks to them, how they see you as an outsider.

Lugging around a camera doesn’t make you an artist, but it might help you understand one. Understanding one is key to communicating with him. Communicating with him is the key to sharing the gospel with him in a way that he can understand and respond to.

4 thoughts on “Contextualization

  1. When you began telling us to involve ourselves in indie culture, I was waiting for the sarcastic, punctuating comment. I think that many m’s could benefit from letting their neck beard grow, but I hope that this post doesn’t give the iPhone worshippers the “authoritative justification” that they’ve been looking for.

    “Cool” can be a great means to an end. In the past I’ve let it become THE end. I would warn against dabbling too far into a culture that rejects God. Without accountability, you might become it.

  2. Kirkwood,
    I was hoping to get people to think about whether an iPhone, neckbeard, or whatever is appropriate for their context. Since the vast majority of ministry in the U.S. takes place in the upper-middle class suburbs, maybe it’s okay that we all look alike (okay, so that was sarcasm.) I certainly don’t think it’s a good idea to worship the “stuff” that consumers define themselves with.

    As I tried to communicate in this post- “cool” isn’t the point. Identifying with and understanding the people to whom we minister for the sake of incarnation is. As for your concern about dabbling too far into a culture that rejects God- I’m not sure I’ve ever seen a culture that didn’t reject God. As you mentioned, that’s why we need the accountability and warning of the local church- a group of fellow foreigners who are committed to that same work of contextualization.

    I actually had Bill in there first, but then I thought that between Rick and Andy, we had that side covered. Maybe I’ll edit him in, though.


  3. “If you don’t do the missionary work of contextualization, you still can grow your church. But it won’t belong to the culture in which it’s planted.”

    Oh how I wish this wasn’t true because more often than not the “church” folk are just being consolidated rather than new cultural pieces being created that are rooted in Scripture; redeeming what can be used for God and rejecting that which cannot. Yet, when you do take the time to do the missionary work, the church grows at a slower rate and is therefore deemed unsuccessful and the plug is pulled before it really ever had a chance to sprout any roots.

Comments are closed.