The Counterintuitive Church (pt.2, The Gaps)
Posted March 26th, 2009 by ErnestPREVIOUSLY: The Counterintuitive Church
Despite the Church’s current tendency toward extreme pragmatism, much of the life that Jesus calls us to is counter-intuitive.
But that doesn’t seem to stop us from depending (almost entirely!) on our human logic when it comes to our missiology. Why is that? Why would we assume that a counterintuitive God would leave us to do things in ways that make sense to our rational process?
As a church planter begins to think about where (geographically) to begin, he almost always looks at where there isn’t a church. The thinking, I suppose, is that you don’t want two churches side by side (except, I suppose, in the Bible Belt, where neighboring churches often fight over parking space). So the planter looks as a map of the city, and decides to focus on the next largest area that doesn’t have a church. It just makes sense to do it that way.
Same thing with missionaries; they look at unengaged people, unreached groups. They assign people to villages that have no (known) evangelical work. It makes the work manageable to look for the gaps and fill them.
Churches are obsessed with the gaps. We want to know what we’re not doing, and then do that. No program for recovering cross-dressers? We feel like we need one. No church for the tattooed-and-pierced crowd? Light some candles and call it good. It just makes sense to start with need and then come up with a solution to meet that need.
But that’s not how God did things in the scriptures. I’m not convinced it’s the way He does things today, either. It didn’t make sense to Peter that God would tell him (in a dream) to focus his ministry on the unclean (and undeserving) Gentiles. It didn’t make sense to Paul that the Spirit would prevent him from going to Asia.
What if God is calling you to plant a church in a neighborhood that already has several? Rather than compete, you might see your work as a demonstration of Christian unity. What if God wants your church planting team to focus on a people group that is, statistically, “reached?” He, in His wisdom, might use your ministry to send members of that “reached” group to take the gospel to the unreached.
My point is this- the gaps aren’t the best place to start. God is the best place to start.
NEXT: Distribution
Related Posts:
Tags: church planting, Gaps, Missions, Pragmatism, Unreached
Unless writing a lot makes one a "writer," Ernest is a former missionary. After more than six years in Western Europe, he moved to Portland, where he drinks too much coffee and over-analyzes human behavior. For more about Ernest, visit the About page where you can read a long-time reader's interview with him. Or, if you don't mind waiting a very, very long time, send him an email.
2 Responses to “The Counterintuitive Church (pt.2, The Gaps)”
March 26th, 2009 at 5:12 pm
Starting with God … what a novel concept. I like it!
Very few people these days seem to make the connection between the work we do and the God we say that we serve. He is supposed to be in control of all our labors. So … it only makes sense to start with him.
Thanks for the great thought!
April 1st, 2009 at 2:10 pm
We planted Matthew’s Table in Lebanon TN – a suburb of Nashville right on the buckle of the Bible Belt. I am often asked asked, “Why Lebanon?” With the follow-up of: “There are already so many churches there.” And the only answer I can give is, “This is where God sent us, period.” And I have to honestly say that this is the VERY last place I thought we would plant, yet I am glad we are here.
Leave a Reply