<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;m Running for President</title>
	<atom:link href="http://missionsmisunderstood.com/2006/09/21/im-running-for-president/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://missionsmisunderstood.com/2006/09/21/im-running-for-president/</link>
	<description>Let's give the Commission back to the church.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 21:25:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://missionsmisunderstood.com/2006/09/21/im-running-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-1090</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 17:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missionsmisunderstood.com/2006/09/21/im-running-for-president/#comment-1090</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d vote for you,but I think we should go pre-WWII where we did not have a standing military. A professional military is like a professional church staff. They need to prove that it is necessary for us to keep paying them, so they  create problems we did not know existed before that only they can fix. &lt;br /&gt;    Also, along with your tightening of the belt, I think that you should offer huge incentives for alternative energy breakthroughs. The US should be the leader in this technology if they want to remain cutting edge in coming generations (not to mention protecting the planet, blah blah blah).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cheers,&lt;br /&gt;MES</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d vote for you,but I think we should go pre-WWII where we did not have a standing military. A professional military is like a professional church staff. They need to prove that it is necessary for us to keep paying them, so they  create problems we did not know existed before that only they can fix. <br />    Also, along with your tightening of the belt, I think that you should offer huge incentives for alternative energy breakthroughs. The US should be the leader in this technology if they want to remain cutting edge in coming generations (not to mention protecting the planet, blah blah blah).</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />MES</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brittany</title>
		<link>http://missionsmisunderstood.com/2006/09/21/im-running-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-1089</link>
		<dc:creator>Brittany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 13:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missionsmisunderstood.com/2006/09/21/im-running-for-president/#comment-1089</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d vote for you!! Although this may interfere with my new belief that Christians should become less political. I&#039;m tired of hearing Christian spokespersons say, &quot;God is on our side!&quot; or &quot;God would want you to vote this way!&quot; Last time I read the NT, seems like Jesus came down hard only on religious spokespersons, not political candidates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d vote for you!! Although this may interfere with my new belief that Christians should become less political. I&#8217;m tired of hearing Christian spokespersons say, &#8220;God is on our side!&#8221; or &#8220;God would want you to vote this way!&#8221; Last time I read the NT, seems like Jesus came down hard only on religious spokespersons, not political candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nomad</title>
		<link>http://missionsmisunderstood.com/2006/09/21/im-running-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-1088</link>
		<dc:creator>Nomad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 06:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missionsmisunderstood.com/2006/09/21/im-running-for-president/#comment-1088</guid>
		<description>You have some pretty good points here.  How about the name for your party as the &quot;Common Sense&quot; party?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have some pretty good points here.  How about the name for your party as the &#8220;Common Sense&#8221; party?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
